.png)
Enumerates parents' fundamental rights over their children's education, healthcare, and welfare, requires schools to adopt implementing policies, and closes consent loopholes that have allowed minors to receive medical treatment without parental knowledge.
OUR POSITIONH4757 takes a significant step by treating parental authority not as a bureaucratic convenience but as a fundamental right deserving legal recognition and enforcement. The bill affirmatively enumerates parents' rights to direct the upbringing, education, healthcare, and general welfare of their children, placing that authority on firm statutory ground rather than leaving it as an implied default that government agencies can quietly erode.
The educational provisions require the State Board of Education to adopt minimum standards implementing these rights and mandate that local education agencies follow suit with their own policies. This moves parental rights from aspiration to accountability. When schools are required to adopt written policies and parents are given administrative remedies to pursue violations, the protections become real rather than theoretical.
The healthcare provisions are equally important. The bill strengthens and expands parental consent requirements for nonemergency medical treatment of minors and, critically, repeals Section 63-5-350, which had permitted health services to be furnished to minors without parental consent. That provision had become a gateway for interventions that parents were never informed about and never approved. Closing it restores the basic principle that parents, not institutions, bear responsibility for their children's medical decisions.
Scripture teaches that children are a heritage from the Lord, entrusted to families for their nurture and formation. That conviction is not merely a religious sentiment; it reflects an ordering of authority that healthy societies have recognized across centuries and cultures. When the state positions itself as the primary decision-maker over a child's healthcare or education, it displaces the very relationship designed to protect that child most faithfully.
The American Council supports this bill because it reflects sound principle: government serves families, not the reverse. By enumerating rights, requiring implementing policy, creating enforcement mechanisms, and removing consent loopholes, South Carolina is building a legal framework that takes parental authority seriously. We encourage the remaining chamber to pass it without delay.